Services
- Direction A
- Direction B
- Direction C
Corporate websites
Complexity grows with the business
Business lines, products and documents accumulate faster than the website logic evolves. Sales teams end up explaining manually what the interface should make clear.
Who are you?
What do you do?
Is this relevant to me?
Why should I trust you?
What happens next?
One company. Different questions.
The actual audience set comes from research. This example shows how one structure can answer different needs without becoming four separate websites.
Do they have the right expertise and relevant experience?
Architecture before interface
We establish business lines, content types and their relationships before drawing screens, so navigation follows the company rather than a library of generic blocks.
Trust architecture
Trust does not live in one testimonial. We place verifiable evidence where each new question appears.
Corporate content system
A content model connects information across sections. One document or case study can appear in the right contexts without manual duplication.
Pages · relationships · filters · languages
A catalogue without pretend ecommerce
For a complex product, helping people evaluate and request terms is often more useful than imitating an online shop.
Basket, checkout and payments belong only where the underlying business process is genuinely ecommerce.
SEO and migration
For an existing website, we prepare and test a migration map before launch. This reduces the risk of losing search signals; it is not a promise to retain rankings.
Verifiable execution
We do not yet publish a corporate B2B case, so we do not substitute a polished presentation for real work. The method is demonstrated through real process artefacts and production quality through published work.

Production project
A live EO Labs production project covering structure, UX/UI, responsive development and technical implementation. It demonstrates execution quality, not a corporate B2B outcome.
View the completed project →Deliverable evidence
Corporate website process
→ Confirmed priorities and project boundaries
→ Page map and user journeys
→ Validated hierarchy for key screens
→ Direction and scalable components
→ Responsive production interface
→ Mapped and migrated content
→ Verified build and release plan
What you receive
Cost and scope
We do not quote a fixed price before understanding the structure. First we define volume and dependencies; then we recommend an engagement format.
The Services page contains EO Labs' current pricing architecture; the final estimate depends on confirmed scope.
Related directions
FAQ
It connects several business lines, content types and audiences. A landing page usually supports one offer; a corporate system must answer different questions across a longer decision cycle.
The count follows the business and content map, not a preset package. We identify page families and reusable content types before estimating volume.
Only when the team regularly updates services, products, documents, news or other entities. We choose a management model after reviewing roles, update frequency and the current stack.
Yes. A catalogue can lead from categories through specifications and documents to a request for proposal without basket, payment or checkout.
Yes. We inventory URLs and content, prepare content and redirect maps, migrate necessary metadata, and verify canonical, hreflang and sitemap. This reduces migration risk but cannot guarantee rankings.
Yes. We design URLs, navigation, localised metadata, text expansion, language relationships and the content update workflow as one system.
Yes. We identify which rules and assets already work and build the digital system around them. If the visual foundation is incomplete, the art-direction scope is agreed separately.
Yes. An audit is useful when it is unclear whether the website needs a full redesign or focused improvements to structure, content and key journeys.
Next step
Share the current website, available materials or an early map of business lines. That is enough to begin defining the scope.