Перейти к содержимомуSkip to content

Insight / Pricing

How much does a corporate website cost — and what actually shapes the budget?

Page count alone says very little about complexity. Architecture, content types, unique templates, integrations, migration and launch assurance are the real cost drivers.

Published
11 September 2026
Reading time
13 min read
Category
Cost and scope

Cost equation

Budget ≠ page count

Choose a level for each factor. This is a causal model, not a price calculator: it shows which decisions expand design, engineering and QA scope.

ArchitectureContentInterfaceDevelopmentIntegrationsMigrationQA

Audiences and structure

One audience → several roles and business lines

Unique templates

Repeatable pages → distinct journeys

Content and migration

Ready material → inventory and restructuring

CMS and integrations

Static pages → related entities and external systems

Motion and QA

Simple transitions → bespoke interactions

Overall complexity impactLOW

Factor 01 / 02

Architecture and templates matter more than raw page count

Ten independent pages may be simpler than a system serving three audiences across eight business lines, products, documents and case studies. The latter needs relationships, navigation rules and a scalable model.

10 static pages

Flat site

  • one primary journey
  • repeatable structure
  • few relationships

connected content types

Structured corporate system

  • several audiences
  • business lines and products
  • documents and work
  • cross-links

30 pages using 3 templates may be simpler than 15 pages using 12 unique templates.

Every unique template adds a separate architecture, design, responsive engineering and QA task. A repeatable content model lets the site grow without complexity rising at the same rate.

30 pages / 3 templates

15 pages / 12 templates

Factor 03 / 04

Content is both readiness and a management system

The estimate depends on who defines hierarchy, naming and relationships, not only on word count. Editorial work is agreed in scope; unspecified copywriting is not included automatically.

01

Client-ready content

Copy, structure and assets are ready to place.

02

Structured with EO Labs

Hierarchy, naming and presentation need to be shaped from available material.

03

Content-heavy project

Many lines, products, documents or legacy records require an inventory and migration map.

A page or a managed entity?

Service, Product, Case, Document, Person and Location can each have fields and relationships. More types and rules mean deeper CMS, interface and migration scope.

  • Service
  • Product
  • Case
  • Document
  • Person
  • Location

Factor 05 / 06

Catalogues and integrations change the technical boundary

01

Simple catalogue

Categories and entries without complex logic.

02

Technical catalogue

Filters, specifications, documents and related products.

03

Ecommerce

Basket, checkout and payments are a different scope.

CRM, forms, analytics, booking/service tools, APIs and external catalogues are categories, not a promise to support every product. Each adds implementation, failure states, testing and maintenance.

Factor 07 / 08

A second language and migration are separate workstreams

Multilingual

This includes localised content, metadata, hreflang, route parity, language switching and QA. Some versions may need structural differences, which should be resolved before development.

Migration

For an existing website we account for content inventory, URL mapping, redirects, metadata and documents, production QA and analytics continuity. The goal is to reduce migration risk, not promise retained rankings.

  • Content inventory
  • URL mapping
  • Redirects
  • Metadata
  • Documents
  • Analytics continuity
  • Launch QA

Factor 09 / 10

Bespoke interaction requires bespoke assurance

01
Simple transitions
States and transitions within the design system.
02
Interactive blocks
Dedicated logic, states and responsive behaviour.
03
WebGL / custom systems
Specialised engineering, a performance budget and broader QA.

A mature budget includes responsive QA, browser testing, forms, metadata, analytics, redirects, accessibility, performance and production checks. These tasks are absent from a static mock-up but decisive at launch.

The mobile versions of three published EO Labs websites side by side: Banya u Mikhalycha, the SOLDOUT loft and Sensetonica

Banya u Mikhalycha, SOLDOUT, Sensetonica · pre-launch testing

The work a layout never shows: each version was checked at a real mobile width.

Pricing scenarios

Three complexity levels — and one public reference point

EO Labs' current commercial model starts corporate or premium websites at $2,500, with a typical published range of $2,500–5,000. This is a reference point, not a package price: the final estimate follows scope review, while CMS, integrations, multilingual delivery and custom functionality are quoted separately.

Public EO Labs reference: /en/services/

LOW

Lean Corporate

One company, simple structure, few templates and no complex catalogue.

  • + ready content
  • + repeatable templates
  • + one primary language
MEDIUM

Structured B2B

Several audiences, services or products, case studies and documents, CMS and migration.

  • + content model
  • + several journeys
  • + legacy content
HIGH

Complex Corporate Platform

Multiple business units, catalogues, integrations, languages and complex data relationships.

  • + integrations
  • + multilingual
  • + bespoke logic

Planning risks

What tends to move the budget — and what helps control it

Increases uncertainty

  • scope changes after design
  • missing content
  • unclear decision ownership
  • too many unique templates
  • late integrations
  • uncontrolled animation
  • inconsistent legacy data
  • multilingual added at the end

Reduces unnecessary scope

  • clear project boundaries
  • design-system reuse
  • fewer unique templates
  • prepared material
  • phased launch
  • deferred non-critical integrations
  • an existing CRM or booking tool instead of custom development
  • business-critical journeys first

This is not a list of client mistakes. These are planning risks the project team can identify before expensive implementation work begins.

EO Labs estimate

The estimate follows the project map

We define the system first, then confirm budget and schedule. The estimate reflects real dependencies instead of an average page count.

  1. 01Understand the business
  2. 02Map the structure
  3. 03Define templates and content types
  4. 04Identify integrations
  5. 05Assess migration
  6. 06Set design complexity
  7. 07Estimate implementation and QA

Useful inputs before an estimate

  • business lines
  • key audiences
  • catalogue need
  • CMS need
  • languages
  • integrations
  • existing website
  • migration volume
  • target deadline
  • content readiness

Continue from here

Next step

Discuss the structure and budget

Share the current website, available material or an early map of business lines. That is enough to decide the next level of detail.